Lexiva Lexiva

Site Map  
Search
   
Efficacy
Tolerability
Dosing Options
Resistance Profile
Lab Abnormalities
Important Safety
Information
Drug Interactions
Prescribing Information
Patient Education
Resources
Home


Efficacy

Treatment-naive patients:
sustained durable response...

LEXIVA/r, QD
APV30002 (SOLO) a randomized, open-label study of LEXIVA/r (1400/200 mg) QD vs NFV (1250 mg) BID in combination with ABC/3TC BID in 649 ART-naive patients.
  * (ITT RD=F) Rebound or discontinuation = failure

43% of all patients had VL >100,000 c/mL at baseline
Median CD4+ cell count was 170 cells/mm3 at baseline
Median increase in CD4+ cell count from baseline was 203 cells/mm3 with LEXIVA/r vs 207 cells/mm3 with NFV



... across all rising baseline VL strata

LEXIVA, BID
APV30001 (NEAT) a randomized, open-label study of LEXIVA (1400 mg) BID vs NFV (1250 mg) BID in combination with ABC/3TC BID in 249 ART-naive patients.
   (ITT RD=F) Rebound or discontinuation = failure.

45% of all patients had VL >100,000 c/mL at baseline
Median CD4+ cell count was 212 cells/mm3 at baseline
Median increase in CD4+ cell count from baseline was 201 cells/mm3 with LEXIVA vs 216 cells/mm3 with NFV



PI-experienced patients: efficacy
compared to Kaletra®

LEXIVA/r, BID
APV30003 (CONTEXT) a randomized, open-label study of LEXIVA/r (1400/200 mg) QD or LEXIVA/r (700/100 mg) BID vs LPV/r (400/100 mg) BID in combination with 2 NRTIs in 315 PI-experienced patients.
   (ITT RD=F) Rebound or discontinuation = failure.

PI experienced = prior exposure to 1-2 PIs
Median increase in CD4+ cell count from baseline was 81 cells/mm3 with LEXIVA/r BID vs 91 cells/mm3 with LPV/r BID
This study was not large enough to reach a definitive conclusion that LEXIVA/r BID and LPV/r BID are clinically equivalent
LEXIVA/r QD is not recommended for PI-experienced patients


GSK Corporation                 Contact Us

This site is intended for US residents only.
© 1997-2008 GlaxoSmithKline. All Rights Reserved.
Legal Notices | Privacy Statement | Contact Us